The Real Truth About Leading Teams: What They Don't Teach You in Business School

Connect with us: SB Nation | Doodle or Die | Medium | Pexels | The Old Reader

Forget everything you think you know about leadership. I'm serious.

After 18 years of watching teams succeed, fail, and everything in between across Melbourne, Sydney, and Perth offices, I can tell you that most leadership advice is absolute rubbish. The kind of sanitised, corporate-speak nonsense that sounds great in boardrooms but falls apart the moment real humans get involved.

Here's what actually works. And fair warning – some of this might make you uncomfortable.

Stop Trying to Be Everyone's Mate

The biggest mistake I see new team leaders make? Thinking leadership is a popularity contest. It's not. I learned this the hard way when I promoted my best mate to team lead back in 2009. Within three months, half the team was taking liberties, deadlines were slipping, and productivity had dropped by 30%.

Leadership isn't about being liked. It's about being respected. And sometimes – here's the controversial bit – you need to make decisions that will annoy people. Good decisions that annoy people are infinitely better than popular decisions that sink the ship.

The best leaders I know aren't necessarily the nicest people in the office. They're the ones who can make tough calls, stick to their guns, and still maintain team morale. That's a skill worth developing.

Emotional Intelligence Trumps Technical Skills Every Time

This one gets the engineers and accountants riled up, but I stand by it. Give me a technically average leader with high emotional intelligence over a brilliant specialist who can't read a room. Every. Single. Time.

I've seen PhD-qualified project managers crash and burn because they couldn't recognise when their team was stressed, overwhelmed, or losing confidence. Meanwhile, some of the most successful team leaders I know started as apprentices or junior admin staff but had that rare ability to understand what makes people tick.

Your team doesn't need you to be the smartest person in the room. They need you to create an environment where the smartest people can do their best work. Emotional intelligence training becomes absolutely crucial when you're dealing with diverse personalities and skill sets.

The "Open Door Policy" Myth

Here's where I'll lose some of you. The traditional open door policy is broken. Completely broken.

Don't get me wrong – accessibility is important. But when your door is literally always open, you become a glorified helpdesk instead of a leader. Your team stops thinking critically because they know you'll solve everything for them. You get pulled into every minor decision, every personality clash, every "what should I do about this email" conversation.

The best approach? Scheduled availability with clear boundaries. I learned this from watching a fantastic operations manager at a Brisbane logistics company. She had specific times when her door was open for anyone to walk in, and other times when she was completely unavailable unless the building was on fire. Productivity increased across the board because people learned to solve problems themselves first.

Your team needs to know they can reach you when it matters. But they also need to develop their own problem-solving muscles.

Micromanagement vs Abandonment: Finding the Sweet Spot

Most leadership advice falls into two camps: either hover over everyone constantly or give them complete autonomy and hope for the best. Both approaches are disasters waiting to happen.

The real skill is knowing which team members need which approach, and when. Sarah from accounts might need detailed weekly check-ins because she's new to the role and lacks confidence. Meanwhile, Tom in IT has been doing this for eight years and just needs quarterly strategy sessions to stay aligned.

I call it "variable management intensity." Not very catchy, I know, but it works. You adjust your management style based on the person, the task, and the circumstances. Revolutionary stuff, right?

The key indicator? Results and stress levels. If someone's delivering good work and seems relaxed about it, back off. If they're struggling or seem anxious, get more involved. It's not rocket science, but you'd be amazed how many leaders apply a one-size-fits-all approach.

Communication: More Than Just Talking

Everyone bangs on about communication being important. No kidding. But most leaders focus on the talking part and completely ignore the listening bit.

Here's what changed my approach entirely: I started treating team meetings like customer service interactions. When someone raises an issue, I don't immediately jump to solutions. I ask clarifying questions. I repeat back what I've heard to confirm understanding. I acknowledge the emotional component, not just the logical problem.

This sounds touchy-feely, but it's actually incredibly practical. Professional development training taught me that most workplace problems aren't actually about the work – they're about feeling heard and valued. Fix that, and half your "difficult" team members become your biggest supporters.

The other thing that works brilliantly? Regular one-on-ones that aren't about project updates. Fifteen minutes every fortnight just to check in as humans. Some managers think this is a waste of time. Those managers usually have high turnover rates.

Authority Without Authoritarianism

This is where a lot of Australian leaders struggle. We've got this cultural thing about not getting too big for our boots, which can make it awkward to exercise real leadership when needed.

But here's the thing – your team actually wants you to lead. They want clear direction, consistent standards, and someone who'll make the hard decisions so they don't have to. The trick is wielding authority without being a tyrant about it.

I've found the best approach is explaining the "why" behind decisions, even when you don't have to. When people understand the reasoning, they're much more likely to buy in. When they don't understand but trust your judgment, they'll follow anyway. When they neither understand nor trust you... well, that's when teams fall apart.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Performance Management

Nobody likes having difficult conversations about performance. But avoiding them doesn't make the problems disappear – it just makes them everyone else's problem.

I used to be terrible at this. Absolutely terrible. I'd hint around issues, hope people would figure it out themselves, and then get frustrated when nothing changed. Sound familiar?

The breakthrough came when I realised that avoiding performance conversations is actually cruel. You're denying someone the chance to improve, you're letting the rest of the team carry dead weight, and you're making the eventual conversation ten times harder than it needs to be.

Quick example: Had a team member who was consistently late to meetings. For months, I said nothing because "it wasn't that big a deal." But it was affecting team morale and setting a precedent. When I finally addressed it directly, they thanked me for the feedback and fixed it immediately. Turns out they hadn't realised how it was coming across.

Most performance issues aren't character flaws – they're skill gaps or awareness gaps. Address them early and directly, and you'll save everyone a lot of pain.

Building Confidence in Others

This might be the most important leadership skill nobody talks about. Your job isn't just to manage tasks – it's to grow your people's capabilities and confidence.

I've noticed that teams led by confident people tend to become confident themselves. Teams led by anxious micromanagers tend to become anxious and dependent. It's contagious, both ways.

The practical application? Start giving people slightly more responsibility than they think they can handle. Not enough to set them up for failure, but enough to stretch them. Then support them through the discomfort. Communication training becomes essential here because you need to be able to coach and encourage effectively.

When someone successfully tackles something they weren't sure they could do, their confidence grows. When that happens repeatedly, you end up with a team of people who don't need you to solve every problem for them.

The Leadership Paradox

Here's the weird thing about leadership that no one prepares you for: the better you get at it, the less essential you become to day-to-day operations. And that's exactly what you want.

The mark of a great leader isn't how much their team depends on them – it's how well the team functions when they're not there. If your team falls apart every time you take a day off, you're not leading; you're just a very expensive babysitter.

This takes time to develop. Years, not months. But when you get there, it's incredibly liberating. Your team becomes self-directing, problems get solved without you, and you can focus on strategy and growth instead of putting out fires.

Final Thoughts

Leadership isn't about having all the answers or being perfect. It's about creating conditions where other people can do their best work. It's about making tough decisions when needed and supporting your team through challenges.

Most importantly, it's about recognising that every team is different, every situation is unique, and what worked last time might not work this time. The moment you think you've got leadership figured out is probably the moment you need to start learning again.

Stop trying to be the leader you think you should be. Start being the leader your team actually needs.

That's the real secret. Everything else is just details.